Baren Digest Saturday, 23 February 2002 Volume 18 : Number 1735 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Cucamongie@aol.com Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2002 08:32:42 EST Subject: [Baren 17141] colors and gobbledy gook Hi all, I've been trying to figure out how to send my posts without the extra double message coming along with it, but I can't find anywhere in aol to change this (I have aol version 6). If anyone knows how to fix this, email me offlist, I'd love to change that option! Mike, watercolors and gouaches do work splendidly for hanga - however, the pure pigments dispersed in water (w/gum arabic/glycerine added for binder/wetting agent respectively) can go a much longer way as they are such concentrated color. happy printing! Sarah ------------------------------ From: Mike Lyon Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2002 09:33:49 -0600 Subject: [Baren 17142] Re: Baren Digest V18 #1734 At 10:01 PM 2/22/2002 +0900, "Bill H Ritchie Jr" wrote: >Seriously, I'm wondering if anybody knows if the cheaper Dremel, at 5,000 >rpm, is okay, or if the 25,000 rpm cutting speed would be better for sharp >edges Hi Bill, Dremel (and other rotary tools) all tend to leave 'furry' edges. The higher speed models tend to remove a smaller chip, so the fur is smaller, too, but they also are more likely to burn. There are power tools available which have a reciprocating movement and they take special gouges and other familiar carving tools and sort of vibrate or jack-hammer them through the wood. They are good for people with severe arthritis or insufficient physical strength to carve with traditional toos. I've used them a bit and didn't like them much. Too heavy and bulky and noisy and slow. Personally, I love the sounds of carving -- the crisp swooshing whisper of clearing out with a sharp tool thrills me a bit. In hanga, you don't have to clear the whole white space, just enough cleared out around the 'islands' which are supposed to print to avoid brushing ink outside the printing area. One to two inches is usually plenty for me depending on the size of the area being printed and the size brush I plan to use during printing (but there are other considerations, one of which is the tendency to unintentionally emboss/deboss the paper during printing with the baren, especially on the edge of printed areas and the outside edge of the non-printing cleared out area). A sharp gouge makes very short work of clearing large areas even in the hardest woods. I usually clear while standing, my work piece on a table fixed against a stop. Graham Scholes recently showed his peg-board like jig which looked to be pretty useful. You can see his set up here: I prefer to have the block flat on a 36 to 38 inch high table. Then I use two hands, one hand behind the other -- the back one does the pushing and controls depth and the front hand rests on the tool palm down to hold the blade down and assists in fine tuning. I keep my elbows in and use my hips and body to push, not just my arms. Kinda a nice rhythmic rocking motion with my whole body. I take shallow cuts just a few inches long with a 5/8" shallow gouge, maybe two cuts per second working methodically. I exhale while cutting and pause while inhaling. It's short work. When done, I clear and flatten the ridges more slowly and carefully. Often the grain isn't parallel to the plank (level). In that case, I try to cut 'with' the grain, that is cutting in the direction the fiber bundles rise -- other wise, the gouge tends to follow the grain down and the surface splits or the knife gets buried deeper than I can push. P.S. Did you ever hook up with Jerry, my Port Townsend buddy? Let me know off-list if you'd like his email or phone again... Mike Mike Lyon mailto:mikelyon@mlyon.com http://www.mlyon.com ------------------------------ From: Mike Lyon Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2002 10:15:42 -0600 Subject: [Baren 17144] Re: Baren Digest V18 #1734 At 10:01 PM 2/22/2002 +0900, you wrote: >From: Charles Morgan >Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2002 14:34:40 -0800 >Subject: [Baren 17135] Re: Baren Digest V18 #1733 > >Mike, > >For us rank beginners, could you say just a bit more about how you use the >tubed water colors. Do you mix them with a bit of water first and then >brush them onto the block? Or do you use them undiluted (expensive that >way)? Just what do you do??? THANKS for your advice. > >Cheers ....... Charles Not yet mentioned, but very convenient and gives consistent and excellent results: water color. The kind that comes in a tube. Permanence, stable binders, add rice paste to taste, no muss, no fuss, no waste. Easy to get started. Personally, I prefer Windsor & Newton brand. Dear Charles, Well, expensive is relative. Paint isn't that expensive (to me). Mix your own pigments is probably cheaper, but prepared watercolor is probably more consistent over time. Here's what I do. I squeeze a little water color (how much depends on how much I think I need for printing) into a shallow dish (I use a set of porcelain dishes about 2 1/2 inches in diameter and about 1/2 inch deep, but anything similar will do -- smart people would use something with a water-tight cover so their pigment's didn't dry out overnight). Then I spray the worm with a little water from a plastic spray bottle I got at the hardware store and mix it with a 25cent 1/4" wide stiff bristle brush I got the same place. I leave it about the consistency of whipping cream, but you can dilute to taste. The only waste is whatever is in your brushes and dish at the end of printing, and if you don't wash your brushes, once the brushes are 'saturated' there isn't any waste at all. I brush water on my blocks several times prior to printing in order to 'condition' and stabilize them. Then, for each print, I use that stiff little 1/4" brush to dab pigment on my block (more dabs for deeper color, or more printings for deeper color), if I want the pigment dispersed more 'smoothly', I add a dab of rice paste (diluted to similar whipping cream consistency and applied with a twin of that stiff little brush) or maybe one for each dab of pigment. Usually I print with primary colors. If I want green, I either print blue on top of yellow, or I put a couple dabs of yellow per dab of blue onto the damp surface of the block. The amount of water on the block (which I drizzle across before the pigment dabs so lightly using just the very tip of a 4" cheapest variety bristle paintbrush and try to control exactly the amount of water to replace that which has evaporated from the block and printing brush and picked up by the last print and produce consistent results for the next print. Anyway, the printing brush is yet another brush -- it could be as simple as a horsehair shoe brush cut to size and with hairs sanded to points, or it could be a $40 to $60 Japanese brush especially made for the purpose -- I get far better results with the most expensive ones, so I spend my money here. after a few prints, this printing brush is fully charged with water, ink, and glue, and acts as a sort of 'buffer' averaging out the natural inconsistencies among those dabs from print to print so that the run of prints is uniform. When you get done brushing out the pigment etc on the block, it usually appears to a novice to be much too dry. Usually beginners keep everything way too wet! Even when they think they have the block dry enough, it is still soaking! But how much pigment/moisture depends a lot on the effect you want, pigment density you want, the PAPER (and it's thickness, absorbancy, dampness), and the character of the block itself. There are a lot of variables. Usually if the block doesn't look flat dry, but is uniformly just damp, with a matte surface and no glossy wet place at all you are close. Printing hanga is definitely not science, but art or 'feel', and you just have to suffer through inconsistent, sometimes disgusting but often interesting and occasionally downright awsomely 'brings tears to your eyes' beautiful results before you begin to get the 'hang' of hanga. Mike Mike Lyon mailto:mikelyon@mlyon.com http://www.mlyon.com ------------------------------ From: Mike Lyon Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2002 10:26:26 -0600 Subject: [Baren 17145] Re: Baren Digest V18 #1734 At 10:01 PM 2/22/2002 +0900, you wrote: >In keeping with our current conversation on first time exchangers and >smudges and such things, Dan Dew has kindly offered to share his first print >with everyone, a neat print and a neater experience. Go have a look: >http://www.barenforum.org/messageboard/guestbook.html Oh, Dan! Here I was all set to enjoy some kind of disaster -- the guy's first print, all covered with bloody fingerprints and ink smudges and gobs of ink everywhere, get myself a few nasty chuckles, you know -- and it turns out to be one of those 'push sweet, shy little Judy Garland out on stage, and after hanging her head and shuffling her feet and wringing her hands a bit, she wins the contest and graciously accepts the thunderous applause of her admiring audience' things -- Geez, Dan, what a beautiful little print you made! And first time out of the box! That's supposed to make the rest of us feel better about OUR first stumble/bumble efforts? Come ON! You must have something more horrible looking than THAT to show us! Geez! ...Nice print. Mike Mike Lyon mailto:mikelyon@mlyon.com http://www.mlyon.com ------------------------------ From: "Maria Arango" Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2002 08:59:22 -0800 Subject: [Baren 17146] dremels and other whiny things I own a variable speed economy Dremel with the pen attachment and use it on occasion. I agree with Mike that clearing is best done with large sharp chisels. I have flexcut chisels and you know I work large; no mallet required. I too have the hori-dai which folds completely flat over my work surface and doubles as a bench stop for good posture. In my experience with the Dremel, you will find it inadequate for clearing as it is much slower than a 1/2" U-gauge. I work on solid cherry mostly and the higher speeds in my Dremel (5000 rpm) tend to burn the wood, but I hear cherry is known for burning easy. The Dremel, however, makes some wonderful random marks that would be tough to get with standard hand tools. I use it often for backgrounds and such things. As far as the fuzzy edges, yes it does that too, but only with some attachments like tiny drills. A caress with a flat chisel over the aforementioned fuzz removes all fuzziness thereof. I have seen Daryl work with the stone attachments, using the edge of the cylinders to make nice sharp marks on birch plywood. I would definitely recommend getting a variety of critters to use, as they have different behaviors and provide a wide variety of marks. I picked up about 600 dental drills at e-bay for $35 about a year ago and am still working on dulling them. Diamond stone tools are also a good buy, but they tend to clog. If you want to clear you will need larger critters. A big drawback of the rotary tools is the dust and vibration. A dust mask takes care of inhaling the dust, but that vibration is awfully annoying on my perfectly healthy wrists. The whiney noise is tolerable, but I have to turn up Carlos Santana way loud, which could start fights with the neighbors. On the reciprocating carvers, I purchased a converter that works with the Dremel and works very well. I had to sharpen all the chisels it came with because they were junk and in fact plan on ordering some better chisels. This works very well, also has a pen-like handle and makes quick work of clearing any area. Main drawback I see is the noise and vibration. The noise is horrible and you can really feel the impact on your wrist despite being effortless to carve. Having said that, both tools I have are on the low end of things as far as mechanized wood working tools. I would check catalogs for the Cadillac models of these things and look for low vibration, low noise. If you are going to make these tools part of your daily grind (heh) I would also invest in a dust control system. Some good websites in http://www.1000woodcuts.com/artsupplies.html under wood and tools. Happy whin whin whinnnnnnnNNNNNNNN CUTTING! Maria <><><><><><><><><><><><><><> Maria Arango Las Vegas, Nevada, USA http://www.1000woodcuts.com maria@mariarango.com <><><><><><><><><><><><><><> ------------------------------ From: Bobbi Chukran Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2002 11:13:16 -0500 Subject: [Baren 17147] Re: dremels and other whiny things Maria, this is really good information to know. I just bought an attachment for our Dremel so I wouldn't have to hold the thing in my hands, but since I already have carpal tunnel syndrome and my hearing is already getting worse, sounds like I should stick to the chisels. I'm also *extremely* allergic to dust of any kind....duh...never thought about it kicking up that much dust.... I was wondering how the Dremels would work on linoleum, though? Anybody try it? Thanks... Bobbi C. - -------------- >In my experience with the Dremel, you will find it inadequate for clearing >as it is much slower than a 1/2" U-gauge. I work on solid cherry mostly and >the higher speeds in my Dremel (5000 rpm) tend to burn the wood, but I hear >cherry is known for burning easy. The Dremel, however, makes some wonderful >random marks that would be tough to get with standard hand tools. I use it >often for backgrounds and such things. ------------------------------ From: Julio.Rodriguez@walgreens.com Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2002 11:15:26 -0600 Subject: [Baren 17148] Re: Baren Digest V18 #1734 02/22/2002 11:15:28 AM Mike writes: "...Printing hanga is definitely not science, but art or 'feel', and you just have to suffer through inconsistent, sometimes disgusting but often interesting and occasionally downright awsomely 'brings tears to your eyes' beautiful results before you begin to get the 'hang' of hanga." Ditto Mike. I am still very much a beginner in hanga style but every new print builts confidence and brings about improvements. Re pigments and watercolours, I do pretty much exactly as described. I have used a variety of stuff, from brand-name watercolors to Speedball, to Ocaldo Printing inks (kindly donated by Gary Luedthke...Gary where are you ?)...to wonderful powder pigments from Japan. I am gravitating toward the better stuff just because the concentration of color is stronger. Also want to try the Akua colors that Sarah & April recommend. Just like Mike said, you add water to the consistency you want to dilute your color. Ditto on all the other brush & application stuff.....the right amount of paste is very important to obtain the desired result (flat even color or the opposite sesame-seed goma-zuri(?)). I think Graham has some photos up on his website on just how much paste to apply per color area. For those wanting to try it.....or having problems now ...here is something perhaps I do differently from the other hanga folks that makes it easier for me. I sometimes use my press for large color areas such as backgrounds. The blocks are cut the same way using kento marks for registration, the color and paste is applied and brushed on the same way, except that instead of using a baren or a spoon....I use my press. This gives me full control for good strong coverage of large areas so hard for beginners to do with barens. For smaller color areas I use my student grade baren. A marriage of sorts. One thing that is so important is to let your brushes, block and paper all become receptive to hanga printing. Your paper must be soft (moist), your block must have received several applications of color/paste before it is truly ready to deliver adequate results and your brushes must have achieved saturation...the first few prints pulled are usually disappointing (I often slip a few sheets of newsprint on top of my stack of paper to work thru this break-in period )...only after bringing all these points together does the fun begin! thanks...Julio Rodriguez (Skokie, Illinois) ------------------------------ From: Vishnovus@aol.com Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2002 13:34:04 EST Subject: [Baren 17149] Re: dremels and other whiny things Maria, Im lurking away here...not adding much as Im a neophyte with woodblocks, but I was interested in what you said about the dremel, as I was thinking of trying one on wood. I use mine on plastic and copper. Sometimes disapointing..sometimes wonderful. After reading your post, I think I will stick to the hand tools for the moment and keep the variables to a minimum. By the way, Im also a Carlos Santana fan too....cant work without Supernatural on. Best, Ld ------------------------------ From: Graham Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2002 11:44:37 -0800 Subject: [Baren 17150] Tube pigments... $$$$$ >Charles wrote..... >For us rank beginners, could you say just a bit more about how you use the >tubed water colors. Do you mix them with a bit of water first and then >brush them onto the block? Or do you use them undiluted (expensive that >way)? Just what do you do??? THANKS for your advice. > >Cheers ....... Charles Gees a guy misses a few hours with e-mail problems and he misses all the fun. I do not recommend using any watercolour tube pigments for Hanga. I have tried them and compared to pigment as explained in my post re, "colourant that are pure pigments in a waterbase dispersant". there is not contest for intensity as related to cost. Winsor Newton watercolour cost about 14.00 14ml tube. That converts to $28.00 per oz. The pigments I get as listed on my web site cost $6.25 to $7.25 for 2 oz jars. This would make tube pigments $56.00 for 2 ounces. Certainly no contest. At Boot Camp Charles you get enough of these pigment to do all the printing you will do at camp plus some. I will be doing a lot of hand holding at class so you need not be concerned with regards to getting it right before hand ... Would hate for you to learn bad habits. They are so hard to break. (<: Someone mentioned using shoe brushes. If you want to experience complete frustration and get turned off of this sport then using a shoe brush is in order. I will be in touch personally to all participants with regards to best buys in inking brushes, baren, and chisels. The technical infor regarding layout for the keyline drawing as it relates to the kento positions on the block...is almost ready for upload to my site. Mike has made an gallant effort to explain how to ink and print a plate. You gotta see it happen and then you will only be half there. Much work is needed to get it down pat. On the subject of seeing it happen ... We have one space due to a cancelation for a Gal. Jan our Aussie, needs company in the first week at Boot Camp. CREATE - CUT - PRINT. Graham ------------------------------ From: Printmaker Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2002 08:43:40 +1100 Subject: [Baren 17151] MDF - Correction Mike Lyon said Yes, Printmaker, that's correct about toxicity for MDF, but the caution is because the sawdust from cutting with power tools can cause problems. I don't believe that hand-carvers will experience any problem at all, indoors or out. Actually Mike, you were so busy _correcting_ me with your superior knowledge, that you didn't read my post correctly. I said 'that it emits toxic fumes'. When you cut it, by _any_ method, and possibly when its just lying around, it emits toxic fumes. I did not say that it had anything to do with sawdust or power tools. Oh, and the name's Josephine [;-)] ------------------------------ From: Graham Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2002 15:36:12 -0800 Subject: [Baren 17152] Re: Fwd: Re: Baren Digest V18 #1734 >I meant to include Graham's link in my post a minute ago, but forgot >-- here it is: Graham Scholes recently showed his peg-board like >jig which looked to be pretty useful. You can see his set up at >http://www.woodblock.info/bootcamp/hori-dai.html > Mike Not only is the picture there if gives all information so one can easily make it. There is a copyright on it. Make one for yourself is fair game. >Graham Scholes recently showed his peg-board like jig Hey Mike, that page has be in existence since Jan 2000 saving the posture of many, I hope. Graham ------------------------------ From: FurryPressII@aol.com Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2002 20:56:35 EST Subject: [Baren 17153] dremels and flex tools and there cousens I don't use dremels for plank grain seems to tear the wood and i am not looking for that kind of effect, But they do work well on end grain. After going through three dremels i bought a jewlers version that you hang from a stand has a flexable attachment i occassionally use it for detail but i still like a burin much better and i prefer to work away from home at my fav. coffee shop. but for taking out large areas in an engraving nothing works better. (i have recently bought a japanese chesel with the same shape as a round scourper but 4 times larger than any engraving tool made can't wait to try it.) john ------------------------------ From: ArtfulCarol@aol.com Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2002 21:07:35 EST Subject: [Baren 17154] Re: Sorry Dear Jean, I appreciate your message of apology. The situation was a mistake and turned ludicrous. You should know that I would not deliberately harass. We shared 2 wonderful days in San Francisco. I am going about promoting the Firemens prints "full throttle." because I feel this is so worthy. Carol ------------------------------ End of Baren Digest V18 #1735 *****************************