Baren Digest Saturday, 11 August 2001 Volume 16 : Number 1517 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- From: GWohlken Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2001 12:29:56 -0400 Subject: [Baren 15354] Re: Baren Digest V16 #1516 Jean, I found the bee and henbane print and it was Roger Ball who had done it. For those who want to see it: http://www.barenforum.org/exchange/exchange_99/exchange_frame.html Also, at Graham's workshop last year, I was trying the same thing but I don't think my print shows it too well, but it is in the background blue of the spider print. http://www.barenforum.org/members/wohlken/exchange_6.jpg Gayle > Hi all, > Jan and I have been having a discussion about goma-zuri, the sesame effect. > Does anyone have a picture of it on their web site? I went looking for the > bee-and-henbane print, I think Julio did it when he was starting out. It > showed the speckled effect pretty well. > Jean > ------------------------------ From: "Jean Eger" Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2001 10:57:25 -0700 Subject: [Baren 15355] edition size The upper limit of 200 is established because that is the legal limit for artworks to be considered fine art. Anything above 200 is considered commercial art. Jean Womack http://www.jeaneger.com > From: "Daniel L. Dew" > Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2001 18:52:30 -0400 > Subject: [Baren 15350] Editions > > Is there a standard number of prints in an edition? > I was told by a collector that 50 was the magic number. > 50? > Seems like a lot and an antique method of determining value. Unless you > count them all, who knows if it was less than or more than? > > dan dew ------------------------------ From: Greg Carter Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2001 15:48:32 -0400 Subject: [Baren 15356] Re: edition size I am one of those artists that hate rules(I annoyed the heck out of my printing teachers in school by the way) I have to say that art is an open and creative thing and I find it silly that at a certian number of print suddenly makes the work not fine art. I belive you print as much as your market and your matrix will allow. Let us remember that many of the prints that we love and treasure from the past (Durer and Rembrandt for instance) were made in editions over 200 and many printed after the artists life time. Though the number may effect value, it alone does not control quality. The problem is that most prints in todays art world that have an edition of 1500 are reproductive but this does not have to be the case. I would love for the artists that I enjoy create an edition of original prints and print 1500 and then sell them at a price I could afford. I happen to have a really nice David Sally relief print that he did in an edition of 500 for a benifit that I bought for 250.00. What is interesting is that this is not a knoked off print but his only hand carved relief print(3 color lino) at that time and it was very interesting. If he only printed 50 it would not be on my wall right now. So every one should print what they are comtforble printing but do not tell me that a print of mine that is made in a large edition is atomatically not fine art. (this happens to be retoricle because I hardly ever print editions over 15) Greg Carter >The upper limit of 200 is established because that is the legal limit for >artworks to be considered fine art. Anything above 200 is considered >commercial art. > >Jean Womack >http://www.jeaneger.com > >> From: "Daniel L. Dew" >> Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2001 18:52:30 -0400 >> Subject: [Baren 15350] Editions >> >> Is there a standard number of prints in an edition? >> I was told by a collector that 50 was the magic number. >> 50? >> Seems like a lot and an antique method of determining value. Unless you >> count them all, who knows if it was less than or more than? >> >> dan dew ------------------------------ From: "Charles and Gail Sheffield" Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2001 12:08:21 -0500 Subject: [Baren 15357] Oops, sorry Sorry, bareners. I apparently sent a message, intended for someone = else, to baren. =20 Gail Sheffield ------------------------------ From: ArtfulCarol@aol.com Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2001 16:20:42 EDT Subject: [Baren 15358] Re: Munakata-Japanese Picasso? See Phil Bivins' Tribute to Munakata, in the 1999 exchange of Barenforum. Phil also mentions the book "The Woodblock and the Artist" by Munakata. Carol Lyons ------------------------------ From: Chromoxylo@aol.com Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2001 17:07:27 EDT Subject: [Baren 15359] Introduction I would like to introduce myself to the Baren group. My name is Paul Ritscher and I live and work in Santa Cruz, California. I have been involved with printing as an occupation or avocation for thirty years, the last twenty in the letterpress field. I taught myself wood-engraving 18 years ago and have produced somewhere between 200 - 250 images. I taught myself the rudiments of Japanese wood-block printing and have done a few things, but would like to do more. I currently operate one of the last old-style letterpress poster printing shops in the country - using wood & metal types and carved wood and linoleum cuts. Over the past 18 years I have built a modest 300+ volume library of technical and historical monographs on wood-engraving and wood-cuts (and I've actually read them all). I look forward to future dialogues with other people with similar or varied interests. Festina Lente, Paul Ritscher ------------------------------ From: "Daniel L. Dew" Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2001 18:15:40 -0400 Subject: [Baren 15360] Re: Introduction Hey, where's the URL so we can all enjoy your work? dan dew > From: Chromoxylo@aol.com > Reply-To: baren@ml.asahi-net.or.jp > Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2001 17:07:27 EDT > To: baren@ml.asahi-net.or.jp > Subject: [Baren 15359] Introduction > > I would like to introduce myself to the Baren group. My name is Paul Ritscher > and I live and work in Santa Cruz, California. I have been involved with > printing as an occupation or avocation for thirty years, the last twenty in > the letterpress field. I taught myself wood-engraving 18 years ago and have > produced somewhere between 200 - 250 images. I taught myself the rudiments > of Japanese wood-block printing and have done a few things, but would like to > do more. I currently operate one of the last old-style letterpress poster > printing shops in the country - using wood & metal types and carved wood and > linoleum cuts. Over the past 18 years I have built a modest 300+ volume > library of technical and historical monographs on wood-engraving and > wood-cuts (and I've actually read them all). I look forward to future > dialogues with other people with similar or varied interests. > > Festina Lente, > Paul Ritscher ------------------------------ From: "Garth Hammond" Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2001 17:33:17 -0600 Subject: [Baren 15361] Portland oregon charset="iso-8859-1" I will be in the Portland area in the second week of september. Are there Galleries or Studios or Shows I should visit? please contact me off site. Garthart@eathlink.net ------------------------------ From: "Alan Basist" Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2001 20:16:53 -0500 Subject: [Baren 15362] Re: goma-zuri Can someone explain the goma-zuri effect and how it's done? Jerelee---- Original Message ----- From: "richard stockham" To: Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2001 1:48 PM Subject: [Baren 15347] Re: goma-zuri > Hiroshi Yoshida talks about goma-zuri in his book. His > print 'portrait of a boy' shows an example of this > effect. You can find this at: > > http://www.hanga.com/landscape/yoshida/images/boy.jpg > > Richard Stockham > Birmingham, Alabama > > --- Jean Eger wrote: > > Hi all, > > Jan and I have been having a discussion about > > goma-zuri, the sesame effect. > > Does anyone have a picture of it on their web site? > > I went looking for the > > bee-and-henbane print, I think Julio did it when he > > was starting out. It > > showed the speckled effect pretty well. > > Jean ------------------------------ From: "Garth Hammond" Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2001 18:39:28 -0600 Subject: [Baren 15363] Re: edition size "So every one should print what they are comtforble printing but do not tell me that a print of mine that is made in a large edition is atomatically not fine art. (this happens to be retoricle because I hardly ever print editions over 15)" SIGH.........My understanding is It has to do with the Internal Revenue Service and it is an arbitrary rule set as a way to assess value related to taxes. No one but the govenment gives a hoot about what you do or do not print. HOWEVER if you decide to print whatever you want etc etc etc there could be consequences you might not like. Jean was sharing information not dictating how you should print..... ------------------------------ From: Greg Carter Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2001 22:57:31 -0400 Subject: [Baren 15364] Re: edition size <200108101930.EAA55612@ml.asahi-net.or.jp> I understand that Garth(I was not addressing my annoyance to Jean) but that does not meen I have to like it. Greg >"So every one should print what they are comtforble printing but do not >tell me that a print of mine that is made in a large edition is >atomatically not fine art. (this happens to be retoricle because I hardly >ever print editions over 15)" > >SIGH.........My understanding is It has to do with the Internal Revenue >Service and it is an arbitrary rule set as a way to assess value related to >taxes. No one but the govenment gives a hoot about what you do or do not >print. HOWEVER if you decide to print whatever you want etc etc etc there >could be consequences you might not like. Jean was sharing information not >dictating how you should print..... ------------------------------ From: John and Jan Telfer Date: Sat, 11 Aug 01 13:31:23 -0000 Subject: [Baren 15365] Re: goma-zuri Dear Richard, >Hiroshi Yoshida talks about goma-zuri in his book. His >print 'portrait of a boy' shows an example of this >effect. You can find this at: > >http://www.hanga.com/landscape/yoshida/images/boy.jpg > >Richard Stockham >Birmingham, Alabama Thank you my friend, Richard Is the background "black" the example? I will go back to Baren and read the background to this. I wish there were more copies of this book "floating" around...it seems to be an encyclopedia for Hanga. Thank you Richard and Jean. Jan ------------------------------ From: John and Jan Telfer Date: Sat, 11 Aug 01 13:31:36 -0000 Subject: [Baren 15366] New Yorker Visitor to Perth Yesterday I had the privelege of hosting Kristin and Rich Rauch here in Perth, Western Australia. I met Kristin at the back of the plane while we were "stretching our legs" between LA and Sydney!! Of the 350+ people on the plane we met..... Kristin is Chair of the Art Department (Art Ed.& Studio) at the State University of New York, New Paltz, USA. Her interest is mainly in photography at Uni. Rich is a Science Lecturer at the same Uni. This is Kristin's fourth visit. They had two separate groups of Teachers and Students touring Australia from and with Armidale Uni, NSW to Cains, Darwin and Central Australia. Rich doing "the Top End" and the northwest of WA. Quite an eye-opener for the students especially the wide open spaces, the loooonng distances and the bulldust! Kristin was here arranging Student Exchanges with Curtin Uni Art Dept. Yesterday we did a quick 4 gallery tour and at each gallery we visited there were people I knew there, but I assured Kristin that it was a "flukey" afternoon and I didn't really know everyone in Perth!! We came here to see our Print Australia and Baren Exchanges and the "stuff" I was doing and had hanging on my walls while the boys went to the golf club for a beer, then we all went back to Fremantle where they were staying and had dinner over looking the Pacific Ocean...till late! She was very interested in the quality of our Exchange Prints... Congrats everyone. It was a wonderful day.. I recommend travel and "talking to strangers" if it gets results like I have experienced in the last three months! Next stop New York! Jan ------------------------------ End of Baren Digest V16 #1517 *****************************