Baren Digest Sunday, 5 November 2000 Volume 13 : Number 1205 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Shireen Holman Date: Sat, 04 Nov 2000 10:05:50 -0500 Subject: [Baren 11980] Re: Baren Digest V13 #1203 At 08:56 PM 11/3/00 -0800, Sharri wrote: >Here's a wonderful quote I ran across today - "Most artists don't daydream >about making great art - they daydream about having made great art." That's funny, but, sadly, not true. The trouble with the art one's already made is that it's there for you to look at in all it's imperfection, and to wish you could have done better! Shireen *********************************************** Shireen Holman, Printmaker and Book Artist email: shireenh@earthlink.net http://home.earthlink.net/~shireenh/ *********************************************** ------------------------------ From: Andrea Cuchetto (Dega) Date: Sat, 4 Nov 2000 13:24:29 -0500 Subject: [Baren 11981] Re: Devil's Advocate (sculpture resource) I would recommend you investigate the following links: http://www.sculptshop.com/ and http://www.sculptor.org/ best, Andrea http://www.absolutearts.com/portfolios/a/andreadegastudios/ ------------------------------ From: barbara patera Date: Sat, 04 Nov 100 12:38:56 Pacific Daylight Time Subject: [Baren 11982] Re: sculpture copies Dimitri, Don't know if they still have them but The Art Institute of Chicago used to carry sculptures for drawing/study. This was years ago but perhaps Julio R. would know for certain if you can still purchase them there. Barbara P. ------------------------------ From: Graham Scholes Date: Sat, 4 Nov 2000 12:57:57 -0800 Subject: [Baren 11983] Devil's Advocate This is getting rather scary. I have tried to send this posting twice and it does not seem to happen. We have been having a night mare situation with Shaw ... losing e-mails. I will try again. Graham ------------------------------ From: "Dr. Rectangle" Date: Sat, 4 Nov 2000 16:24:08 -0500 (EST) Subject: [Baren 11984] Windows, American Print Alliance >The show is called Windows, the gallery is Dana McCutcheon >Gallery, 2571 Shattuck Avenue... HA ha ha haHA ha hAaaa... Hey, Sarah, it happened again: the strange parallel art life. Both you and I submitted to Dana McCutcheon's "Windows" show, and again you were accepted while I got a very pretty rejection letter in the mail! :) Congratulations! Last time this happened, it was with the Woman Made Gallery, but I love them so--I tried again and got into their Holiday Bazaar this December. I wonder what the "Windows" show ends up to be like... I was disappointed that Dana didn't accept any of my works, because I thought that surely their desired "broad interpretation" of windows would recognize something refreshing about my art that utilizes the odd medium of plastic envelope windows from junk-mail.... *Shrug* Ah, well! :) And Maria, does The American Print Alliance fall into that list too? Love <3 & Lint * ! Kat http://www.u.arizona.edu/~katherip/art.html ------------------------------ From: B Mason Date: Sat, 04 Nov 2000 13:25:38 -0800 Subject: [Baren 11985] missing messages Graham, They are coming through, I have seen that message three times, so something is giving you wrong information. This was a really good discussion you generated. Lots of opinions. Just what we need, lots of peope involved with their ideas. Barbara ------------------------------ From: Graham Scholes Date: Sat, 4 Nov 2000 13:51:36 -0800 Subject: [Baren 11986] Re: missing messages >Graham, >They are coming through, I have seen that message three times, so >something is giving you wrong information. This was a really good >discussion you generated. Lots of opinions. Just what we need, lots of >peope involved with their ideas. >Barbara Thank you Barbara. I appreciate your feedback. I guess it must be some sort of problem with Shaw Cable. When we were putting together that Computer newsletter it just about drove us around the bend... actually it did .... had to drive to the neighbours to pick up and send stuff. grrrr Sincerely, Graham ------------------------------ From: "jerelee" Date: Sat, 4 Nov 2000 18:19:45 -0600 Subject: [Baren 11987] competition As the new girl on the block, this forum has been extremely interesting. = One point that seems to be paramount amoung you is the concept that = competition is good. If art is purely subjective and there's a panel of = ass-holes judging your work, than does the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd place Miss = America winner feel competent like a true survivor? As a novice,with = other vices I don't see competition as really stoking the creative = genius within. Do these shows really, really make you feel as if the the = jackel has won his prize? ------------------------------ From: Julio.Rodriguez@walgreens.com Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2000 18:10:33 -0600 Subject: [Baren 11988] Re: "Standards" versus sincerity James has put it very nicely: "So, while we agree that not every print in an exchange will be excellent, that hardly demeans the exercise. Why? Because each and every print reflects what [Baren] is all about. And that, my friend, is why we do it." The exhibitions are an offshoot from the exchanges...they were not planned but rather improptu opportunities that came about to share our work with others thru the hard work of the members. It would be a different story if we put out a call for prints for a juried Baren exhibition. Gayle's idea is a good one and I certainly welcome Graham with his experienced background and years of teaching experience to critique our exchange prints. As Dave said, the mechanism is there to give each individual artist either private or public criticism. What better way to raise the standard ? Kind of a cyber-bootcamp............How about it ? Of course it is very hard to really properly critique the works based on a low resolution image on the web. I am always shocked at the comparison when receiving my prints. The variety of techniques, image sizes, special papers used, oil vs water, etc....can only be fairly judged when held in ones hands. But for that, I am afraid you have to participate. The exchanges and exhibitions have never been about "Look how good we are". They have been about "Who we are", "What we do" and the fun we are having doing this stuff. For lot of us who have no aspirations to hang in the Louvre, is like being in school again....and for the many that follow an art career is a nice break from their everyday agenda and a time to step back experiment and let loose.....that is all it's meant to be and all that it should ever be. Julio ------------------------------ From: Julio.Rodriguez@walgreens.com Date: Sat, 4 Nov 2000 23:46:51 -0600 Subject: [Baren 11989] Re: missing messages and other stuff.... Graham, your repeated postings and "accidental" mailing of a private post to the general list is quite transparent. Please stop, you fool no one with your tactics. My work and efforts within the council's activities in no way prevents me or any other council member from speaking our mind on this list. There was no flaming on my post, just simply questioning the standards to which you hold your own art. If you reread my last sentence, you will see that is actually quite complementary to your person as I have always viewed your work and teachings in high esteem. But I feel that the general forum is not getting a true picture and since we often use the term "family" here .... At the risk of airing some dirty laundry....here is the real problem at hand................ It's become quite obvious to me, the council and many other members on the forum that since bootcamp ended not all is well between you and Dave. Posts by you and Marnie right afterwards confirm this. While I respect your right to view your opinions and express your differences between printmaking styles, creative ability, sales technique, preferences, etc, etc, etc,etc, etc, etc....... your message has become somewhat repititive and borderline arrogant. With every new post you waste no opportunity to pick and redirect at Dave. A few posts back, you took a praiseful post directed at Baren/Dave by Murillo, took it apart using it once more to snap back at Dave. This is not the first time someone unsubscribes from the list because of your personal comebacks. Not everyone may have the fortitude that Maria, Dimitris, me and others have shown in responding to you this time....others simply ignore it hoping it will go away, go back to lurking.....or worse.....leave the group feeling terribly embarrassed. You had been made aware of the council's point of view on this ongoing problem on 10/29 via a friendly and reconciliatory private post and yet you chose to lash out once more and question the validity and effort put forth by Arye and others wishing to share our works with the public. While your arguments are valid, have led to some good discussion and you and others certaintainly have an open forum to speak your piece, I question your timing and your intentions. In your own words "I think I rattled the bushes a bit and am pleased as that was the full intent of the posting". Art IS a very personal thing, and asI did, I am sure others also took your comments as a most personal afront. At the rate Maria (and other council members) is having to read and answer private messages regarding your attitude and demeanor on the forum, she will never reach her 1000th woodcut, much less her 500th. Had this critical offensive been aimed at someone other than Dave, I and others would have spoken out much sooner. In his own personal style he has dealt with it. But now it's impacting other members. Perhaps you can take these issues you have , whatever they are!....offlist and come to some accord. Leave the forum for what it is intended....woodblock printmaking....not a personal battleground.......I think you made your point on the bootcamp matter a while back, it is time to move on!!!! If you care to continue this discussion offlist.....I promise my server will not lose any of your posts........ Sincerely.......Julio ------------------------------ End of Baren Digest V13 #1205 *****************************